From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Thu Jul  9 18:58:02 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A52997702
 for <freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  9 Jul 2015 18:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
 [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5811AA5;
 Thu,  9 Jul 2015 18:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.113.128.32])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C22F81315;
 Thu,  9 Jul 2015 21:57:59 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <559EC436.1030403@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:57:58 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
Organization: FreeBSD
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Where 3rd-party PAM modules should be placed?
References: <559EB7E6.6040805@FreeBSD.org>
 <1436466952.3471772.319701833.03042483@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1436466952.3471772.319701833.03042483@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:58:02 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09.07.2015 21:35, Mark Felder wrote:

> For the record, I've always used full path names in my /etc/pam.d
> files to enable additional modules. Being able to use the short
> names would be nice.
pam.conf(5) says:

The module-path field specifies the name or full path of the module to
call.  If only the name is specified, the PAM library will search for it
in the following locations:
  1.   /usr/lib
  2.   /usr/local/lib

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=4e1s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----