From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 13 20:23:11 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E612A1065674
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1ea])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4BE8FC1A
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 7F7B29358C;
	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
In-Reply-To: <20100813160109.8BDDA1CC3A@ptavv.es.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:23:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1B284ECC-9A69-4727-9F9F-7A85C8374463@lassitu.de>
References: <20100813160109.8BDDA1CC3A@ptavv.es.net>
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent IO performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:23:12 -0000

Am 13.08.2010 um 18:01 schrieb Kevin Oberman:

> Note the dramatic differences even on the same kernel. For the =
December
> 6 kernel, for example, I see a maximum of 23,676,086 and a minimum of
> just 18,304,565. ????

Are the disks still OK?  If any sectors have been remapped between runs, =
additional seeks would be needed.  I think it's unlikely, but checking =
with smartmontools should only take a few minutes.


Stefan

--=20
Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811