From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 4 0: 2: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from south.nanolink.com (south.nanolink.com [217.75.134.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5CDB37B41D for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 2771 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 08:07:32 -0000 Received: from discworld.nanolink.com (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (217.75.135.248) by south.nanolink.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 08:07:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 4164 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Apr 2002 08:01:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:01:37 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Spades Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openssh ports err Message-ID: <20020404110137.B336@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Spades , security@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3.0.32.20020404153300.0289ae28@singnet.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.20020404153300.0289ae28@singnet.com.sg>; from spades@galaxynet.org on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:33:02PM +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:33:02PM +0800, Spades wrote: > ports openssh err >=20 > bash-2.05a# cd /usr/ports/security/openssh > bash-2.05a# make install > =3D=3D=3D> Patching for openssh-3.1_6 Is this really the first thing you saw? No "Extracting for openssh.." before that? This means that you had a previously extracted source, possibly an old one, possibly with some patches applied and some failed. This would be a good reason for the patches that have been previously applied to fail now :) You should *ALWAYS* do a 'make clean', both when building and when rebuilding a port. Oh, and BTW - this is not a security question, this is not -chat material, this is a question related to the FreeBSD Ports Collection, so it is only logical that it should have gone to -ports instead :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If you think this sentence is confusing, then change one pig. --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjysCGEACgkQ7Ri2jRYZRVPWigCgnWZozy1w9rDg7Fw45tF6HFPW ucUAoMKdZw72ZA5rGagXjLOULWpWRPRF =EU6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message