From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 20 18:22:11 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C28106566C;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E618F8FC21;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.14.4/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2KIM4gf004252;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.14.4/8.13.4/Submit) id o2KIM4xw004251;
	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <201003201822.o2KIM4xw004251@apollo.backplane.com>
To: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws>
References: <4BA4E7A9.3070502@FreeBSD.org>
	<201003201753.o2KHrH5x003946@apollo.backplane.com>
	<d74eb87c1003201113q21ddde15nea6dc77be22ce846@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Increasing MAXPHYS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:22:11 -0000

:Pardon my ignorance, but wouldn't so much KVM make small embedded
:devices like Soekris boards with 128 MB of physical RAM totally unusable
:then? On my net4801, running RELENG_8:
:
:vm.kmem_size: 40878080
:
:hw.physmem: 125272064
:hw.usermen: 84840448
:hw.realmem: 134217728

    KVM != physical memory.  On i386 by default the kernel has 1G of KVM
    and userland has 3G.  While the partition can be moved to increase
    available KVM on i386 (e.g. 2G/2G), it isn't recommended.

    So the KVM reserved for various things does not generally impact
    physical memory use.

    The number of swap buffers (nswbuf) is scaled to 1/4 nbufs with a
    maximum of 256.  Systems with small amounts of memory should not be
    impacted.

    The issue w/ regards to KVM problems on i386 is mostly restricted to
    systems with 2G+ of ram where the kernel's various internal parameters
    are scaled to their maximum values or limits.  On systems with less ram
    the kernel's internal parameters are usually scaled down sufficiently
    that there is very little chance of the kernel running out of KVM.

						-Matt