From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 4 13:05:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA12195 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:05:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (root@buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA12190 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA06662 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 16:07:40 -0500 Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa16867; 4 Feb 97 16:06 EST Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 16:06:36 -0500 (EST) From: Steve To: Robert Shady cc: chris@main.netcorps.com, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FrontPage Extenstions In-Reply-To: <199702042045.PAA12070@server.id.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Robert Shady wrote: > > > I read from Ready-to-Run's frontpage section it isn't compatible with > > > BSD's encryption. Does anyone know if that's still the case. (You just > > > never know with Microsoft, if you're reading something that's current.) > > > > You a brave soul - I personally wouldnt want that big a security hole. > > Is that what you tell your customers who beg for Front Page extensions because > they have absolutely know idea how to "code" a web page otherwise? Yes. I say "Unless you want to rent an entire machine dedicated to YOUR site, at $xxxx.00/mth, I cannot oblige you. What you want is not secure and I cannot jeopardize other customers. If you choose to rent an entire machine to this purpose, We will not be hel responsible in the event of a cracke incursion." Or something very close. Most people are thankful to know they are beeing looked out for. You can use front page to make pages, without using front page junk in your web server.