Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:01:21 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Matt Simerson <freebsd@blockads.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is natd the right tool? Message-ID: <20020411230121.E39738@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <70BBF3C4-4D4F-11D6-8065-00306553B5E4@blockads.com>; from freebsd@blockads.com on Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:24:24AM -0400 References: <70BBF3C4-4D4F-11D6-8065-00306553B5E4@blockads.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:24:24AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote:
> Natd is a very cool tool for doing stuff like redirecting
> connections from an external network to an internal one but I'm have a
> slightly different problem. I have a single host with one public
> interface:
>
> host - fxp0 = 192.168.7.251
>
> Also on this same host is a bunch more IP's on the loopback interface:
>
> host - lo0 = 127.0.0.1
> 127.0.0.2
> .....
>
>
> On each of the loopback addresses I have a DNS server listening. This
> part works just fine:
>
> matt@matt: {101} % dig www.foo.com @127.0.0.2
> <verbosity snipped>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> www.foo.com. 1D IN A 207.89.154.94
>
>
> What I want to be able to do is send a dns query to the external
> interface of the machine on a non-standard port and have it redirect
> the query to a loopback address/port and return the query the
> appropriate query result to me.
Why don't you just have each named(8) listen on the different port?
See 'listen-on' in named.conf(5).
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020411230121.E39738>