From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  2 03:03:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC36D88E
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 03:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com (mail-pd0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.192.169])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFFCD4F
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 03:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id fp1so10512103pdb.0
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
 :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
 :to; bh=G8vAEKmTl1S9G4Wl6hqniB3gG4KGbdMq+oTCDUWB9Mo=;
 b=K9V60D9bgswNUc7bZ7TXWKvFycQaoHqOOxtEtBDZoTLFVlSoRpOzY1FYaxQ006q/81
 16g0X3AKQz33ciwrRHCrRjZl+0zExLJ+hipjxM+jzhcnZzcrxVyHTU6ix/F+XTHZGn6k
 67hpWzCJLZjc3JLMxYnV2H9jYOv/wMTEZhej/l7IgwoTnK+4zHQyA9MPFt3UEbgbP33V
 mT7T2Cth5pNhWqewDR0mx147eYfj7MZ/+gGmIDI04drnpqJxv8gV5Ph9I5wFnUgY11pX
 xbHVS/0LcOnPIQRYK0F2B0gvfodQJKsKESzWnFQ3Nq2yKqVLYJjDZU3sNUXkV5eTsFxj
 sWiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUdzD55wfPecXElHZdH/2sZcFvJOJGc/TPESShdEth4lLpxabsvbCJZhkq1td5CyAXYzmo
X-Received: by 10.68.226.197 with SMTP id ru5mr34773688pbc.77.1396407788966;
 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.64.24.154] (dc1-prod.netflix.com. [69.53.236.251])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm924662pbk.47.2014.04.01.20.03.07
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: make WITH[OUT]_* more useful?
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:03:05 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <00367FFD-4F88-4257-B25F-D4B3F0644FE1@bsdimp.com>
References: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net>
 <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 03:03:15 -0000


On Apr 1, 2014, at 1:40 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb =
<bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:

>=20
> On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote:
>=20
>> # NO_* takes precedence
>> # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless
>> # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes"
>> # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default.
>> and
>> MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error.
> ...
>> Thoughts?
>=20
> I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again =
rather than reducing it.  I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die.

That was my plan=85

Warner