From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 11:21:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9CC16A418 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl) Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (arm132.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.17.198.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A848713C44B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl) Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1371245E8F; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (cvl74.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.19.93.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB35245F3F; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:19:58 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Michael Monashev Message-ID: <20070922111958.GA1614@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20070921143318.GC5690@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070921170506.GB9445@garage.freebsd.pl> <1310567292.20070921235802@gmail.com> <20070922011847.GH9445@garage.freebsd.pl> <1231480340.20070922112446@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1231480340.20070922112446@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.garage.freebsd.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: raidtest for zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:21:44 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:24:46AM +0400, Michael Monashev wrote: > ????????????, Pawel. >=20 > > What's strange about those results? Can you show us 'zpool status' and > > explain what you expect and why? >=20 > > zpool status > pool: tank > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: >=20 > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ad6s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ad8s2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ad10s3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ad12s1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ad14s2 ONLINE 0 0 0 >=20 > errors: No known data errors >=20 > I compare graid5, graid3+gcache, raidz. My target is find software > RAID with better read performance and huge storage size. I planing > place a lot of little (1-100kb) images on it. >=20 > Here is my test results: http://michael.mindmix.ru/168-958-rezul-taty-tes= tirovanija-graid5-graid3-gcache-i-raidz.zhtml >=20 > graid3+gcache with round-robin reading is 1.25 faster than 1 disk. > graid5 is 2.18 faster than 1 disk. > raidz is 7.7 faster than 1 disk. >=20 > 5 disks cant read faster than 5 times. raidz is 7.7 faster than 1 > disk! >=20 > This is strange for me. ZFS ZVOL doesn't present raw blocks to use, like graid3/graid5, so it's quite possible that because of how the data was written and how ZFS prefetches the data it's faster than one disk. You may want to compare one raw disk to single disk pool. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG9PpeForvXbEpPzQRAmLNAJ4kYFXVPNT9pdXtpAv2kautYMk5kgCg7KZV V/7Juhq5x3JR1lltyQ47IVM= =biwW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--