Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:29:39 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please explain. Message-ID: <20040919112939.66713788@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040919171422.155a98c3.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <00d001c49dd4$7382dc40$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <xzp7jqqfgsj.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040919171422.155a98c3.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:14:22 +0200 Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:57:00 +0200 > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > > <timh@tjhawkins.com> writes: > > > It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue > > > that needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd > > > developers nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the > > > current smp work are just 'work-arounds' not real fixing? > >=20 > > Did David Rhodus put you up to this? You should just tell him to do > > his own dirty work. >=20 > Why don't you and Bosko leave the DragonFlyBSD people alone? I don't get > it. Are you jealous of their work or what? You're not helping > inter-camp relations if you pick on them every time you have an > opportunity. Oh back off; you obviously have only a small part of the story. >=20 > I'm sure David would post anything he wants to without resorting to > silly games. You're correct; he would just slander throughout forums such as /. and the like; that is sooo much better then coming here. Yet, it does keep our lists a little cleaner. --=20 Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040919112939.66713788>