Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 18:48:47 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Lupe Christoph <lupe@lupe-christoph.de> Subject: Re: Challenge during the ports freeze Message-ID: <20050805164846.GA58754@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050805152311.GB4282@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050804211547.GA678@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050805060115.GA20697@lupe-christoph.de> <20050805152311.GB4282@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# kris@obsecurity.org / 2005-08-05 11:23:11 -0400:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 08:01:15AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> > Munin behaves this way in all other platform ports. Changing this
> > behaviour would make the FreeBSD the sore thumb of the Munin ports ;-)
>
> I remember these previous discussions and accept that it would take
> some work to make munin-node ports-conformant, but unfortunately, it's
> not easy to exclude this port from the standard package checks (no
> other packages need that), which means it will have to stay listed as
> a "broken" port for now because of these extra files.
How about IGNORing it forever?
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050805164846.GA58754>