Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Jan 2004 22:22:56 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update
Message-ID:  <1075000976.48478.68.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <opr2a94dcg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
References:  <1074887353.768.86.camel@gyros> <20040123201250.GK3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <1074889273.768.101.camel@gyros> <20040123202314.GN3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2asl1k28ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20040124210635.GH3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2a94dcg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-AtsxmePMJw8phn5LDbry
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 22:18, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>=20
> wrote:
>=20
> >>> (01.24.2004 @ 1559 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.7K: <<
> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:23:14 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org=
>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>(01.23.2004 @ 1521 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.8K: <<
> >> >>On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:12, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> >>> >> (01.23.2004 @ 1449 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.1K: <<
> >> >>What do you mean by, "stops cold?"  I have no problem with backing=20
> >> this
> >> >>out...but I like Mezz's suggestion, too.
> >> >>>end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Joe Marcus Clarke <<
> >> >
> >> >I mean nothing will build against it.
> >>
> >> Which part did it failed? Right now, I am building x11/gnome2 (2.5.x)=20
> >> and
> >> so far it looks good compile w/ gettext 0.13. It's on the gnomepanel=20
> >> part
> >> now, it will be around two to three hours to finish. I wrote a simple
> >> shell script (attaching) to do the work edit all /usr/ports/*/*/Makefi=
le
> >> that has gettext in it. However, when the build is done and I do the=20
> >> test,
> >> then I will let everybody know the result.
> >>> end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Jeremy Messenger <<
> >
> > I think the problem was caused by something else. I'm now logging my
> > builds with 2>&1... dunno why I wasn't before.
> >
> > I have 2 more builds to test stuff before I try a gettext-0.13 one.
> > It'll be a few days but I'll give it a better whirl.
>=20
> Here's result: It compiles and runs with gettext 0.13 great, no problem s=
o=20
> far with Gnome 2.5.x and other apps.

Great!  Thanks for testing.  Trevor has given me a patch that chases
gettext in all affected ports, so I will most likely test that on the
next 4-exp build.

Joe

>=20
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>=20
> > # Adam
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Weinberger
> > adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net
> > http://www.vectors.cx
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-AtsxmePMJw8phn5LDbry
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAEzaPb2iPiv4Uz4cRAq/RAKCJle0b18xG5DnByTBmAOPc2Wd4gACgqUCt
rC9Tc0XKPqHYdHqrqFqBSW0=
=XSLQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-AtsxmePMJw8phn5LDbry--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075000976.48478.68.camel>