Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:33:09 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181728330.29114-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <200402181358.i1IDw5Xh050695@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is this OK? I was following your lead, so anything that's decided is fine with me. Perhaps some of these deprecated messages should be generalized to say "not recommended for new installations: use XYZ instead." My idea for instituting the deprecations is not to remove any existing functionality. My idea is to try to "take out the garbage" in the ports collection -- I think we would all agree that there is some -- it's just a question of what constitues "garbage". I'm really more interested in things that, e.g., stand no chance of ever working on 5.3, or haven't fetched in 3 years, or are otherwise abandonware. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181728330.29114-100000>