From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 22:33:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF17416A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C1143D49 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (ee5d2195be73a7d058f51436b813d444@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2O6XYfG018296; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBE535267B; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kaarthik Sivakumar Message-ID: <20040324063333.GA44331@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org> <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs-devel port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:33:36 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:26:35AM -0500, Kaarthik Sivakumar wrote: > >>> "GJ" =3D=3D Gary Jennejohn writes: > GJ> Wouldn't hurt since I, the maintainer, can't get into freefall to > GJ> do any commits. >=20 > Ok, I will file a pr. >=20 > GJ> This is really a nit! xemacs has bigger problems, but what the > GJ> heck. >=20 > I know, but a user did mention on the xemacs-beta mailing list that > 21.5 is gamma and that raised concerns there about our packaging. So.. >=20 > What bigger problems do you see with xemacs? I run > compiled-from-source xemacs 21.5.x and other than standard beta > software problems with xemacs in general (ie not FreeBSD specific), > everything seems ok. I use compiled-from-source 21.4 at work and that > is quite good. Any chance you could submit a patch to update the ports to the current versions? They're a bit behind right now. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYSu9Wry0BWjoQKURAivhAJ42P1LenoaD75zqjMpdL8vcqtiJgwCgvwFn NvqpLdWo0jXxFFqepDm+qOg= =MB/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--