From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 15:39:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B81065672 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@freebsd.org) Received: from nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 573898FC0A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 -0000 Received: from [72.30.22.186] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1062.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 29214.36761.bm@omp1062.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 98952 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jan 2012 15:39:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1326814752; bh=hPxCRoWH+vPSGcstQjSSBFCAWfJFOLghKCv49fhotlw=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xmt800dGR1EvDy4LlBEOopp7jdDD+pVX0EKh0FcvosTGnENACHrCwGMxRQUY2AUFBz8kDpn4Zs90Jvkq3hAjsjvYPqdmAKeAqSmbqhyoUQFUJk0fV7jz26S+fh1FLzut+n5yNqzX1BW6yCA3Sc8gEZVWFo/KvwFOMTEkwm4/0fc= X-YMail-OSG: nOMNoBIVM1krOhj.mdQ7xrjfDLtal5aovmgCgoBH4_h8aHT nvP967b56CIIfNuO2wqx4p7HEg3VuV4RE5k3G7Ig6QDRcPjn_keexX76kzBh J3y4Wnc10H2IrtE_5nHOmtx1JvOh8cOf8LIqTGOeZAVBqvYLyCSlDgCswik5 oTLCqKTyHkRdafFP5KaTpjC7uLT.od59DGZL2jQdI9YG9apH.kC31RQennOy apxk7fjgIxlz2c8WBEz685OTpwbGydVcgVlPvCqnoRqTGIhruK8TFoRj.ooA Yrzxf873CkdIKYE5OgR16J5e_.6pYPJBqjVm7oaThcC0_CTcCcgMbBMxqKLL 1iMjJzAr.dWCeAEcIe6nMp2ZUf49HzPgy.vED_KYCSWNN.vunNZ5zl7kP.iR Zz7fQmugC8LXIFWXm8pAAKvrr4AZioYKWpHAPaT8g6m1eXMMWDr.2MP3BFD1 LEhYPtMPYTL6HypKZaktXS9VVEslr5Bd10i5hWSdGEIphr6KFSY7mpc_Kw97 kuwfL0E0XMLPlcc.8BELYs5oDiDILG9OXo5VM1bWDGtvhsM7S02eUU0cfJtN Y4yX0BLcLzA-- Received: from [200.118.157.7] by web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:39:12 PST X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 Message-ID: <1326814752.93513.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:39:12 -0800 (PST) From: Pedro Giffuni To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20120117092409.GH4729@azathoth.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfg@freebsd.org List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:39:13 -0000 Hi Baptiste!=0A=0A--- Mar 17/1/12, Baptiste Daroussin ha= scritto:=0A=0A> > FWIW,=0A> > =0A> > --- Lun 16/1/12, Eitan Adler =0A> ha scritto:=0A> > =0A> > =0A> > > > Hi=0A> > > >=0A> > >= > I have just raised a pr.=0A> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c= gi?pr=3D164230=0A> > > =0A> > > I'd object for the same reason we have=0A> = www/firefox not=0A> > > www/mozilla-firefox=0A> > > =0A> > > People expect = to find OO.o is specific places.=0A> > > =0A> > =0A> > I see .. we can keep= it as openoffice.org for now=0A> > To make it easier to find but when the = first Apache=0A> > release is made we should rename it because the new=0A> = > trademark owner renamed it to Apache OpenOffice=0A> > and the word Apache= is part of the brand.=0A> > =0A> > Pedro.=0A> =0A> In my concern there is = no problem in renaming it at all as=0A> soon as a MOVED entry is added, OO.= o is dead and now it=0A> is AOO, respecting the naming is good imho.=0A> = =0AHas netcraft confirmed it? ;-).=0A=0AFWIW, we are in no shortage of requ= ests to use the=0AOpenOffice.org brand so I suspect we will keep using=0Abo= th names for a while.=0A=0A> This case is not the same as Mozilla Firefox b= ecause this=0A> is Firefox (software from Mozilla), in our concern this=0A>= Apache OpenOffice (software from Apache) (Pedro,=0A> Maho do you confirm ?= ), in that case renaming is fine imho,=0A> otherwise the rename should go t= o openoffice-3-devel.=0A> =0A=0AAdding the Apache name to the brand is the = standard Apache=0Apolicy and in the ports tree we already have more that=0A= 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache" name.=0A=0AI personally pre= fer shorter names (I am lazy typing paths)=0Aand PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D apache- i= s sufficient to solve the=0AApache naming requirement but this port is clea= rly Maho's=0Aprerogative and if he says the name is apache-openoffice,=0Ath= en so be it.=0A=0APedro.=0A