From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  3 15:45:09 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614D4106567F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 May 2008 15:45:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net)
Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5468FC1C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 May 2008 15:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net)
Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71])
	by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6823241C72C;
	Sat,  3 May 2008 17:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de
Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27])
	by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id jvi5M-vcqe-D; Sat,  3 May 2008 17:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66)
	id 60C8B41C759; Sat,  3 May 2008 17:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net
	[10.111.66.10])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F3744487F;
	Sat,  3 May 2008 15:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 15:43:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <4816D1D2.7010603@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20080503154219.C47338@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References: <4816D1D2.7010603@elischer.org>
X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 15:45:09 -0000

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:

Hi,

> a kernel needs to be created with the option ROUTETABLES=N
>
> e.g.
> +options                ROUTETABLES=2           # max 16. 1 is back 
> compatible.
>
> leaving this out will result in just a single routing table as per normal.
>
> the max is 16 but I have an artificial (even lower) at 8 but that may
> be gone by the time people try it :-)

After reading through this thread and not looking at the patch again
for the moment, where does this limit come from? Do you think this
could be extended to more in the future?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb              Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.