From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 28 02:50:31 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771011065672;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mezz@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1E28FC20;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o3S2oVxQ036672;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 GMT
	(envelope-from mezz@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from mezz@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o3S2oVLZ036662;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 GMT (envelope-from mezz)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 GMT
Message-Id: <201004280250.o3S2oVLZ036662@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: mezz@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, marius@FreeBSD.org
From: mezz@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/145615: sysutils/brasero antlr/pcct conflict build
	problem.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:50:31 -0000

Synopsis: sysutils/brasero antlr/pcct conflict build problem.

Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnome->marius
Responsible-Changed-By: mezz
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 28 02:49:15 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Change owner to marius: I have taken a look at cdrdao port. It only depends on
pccts in the build time. I think it's safe to use internal pccts (the one that
is included in cdrdao) instead of ports. It will solve the conflict issue of
pccts vs antlr when someone want to install cdrdao if antlr exists in the
system.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145615