Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:20:28 -0700 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netpbm-10.35.80_2 Message-ID: <20110428152028.GS1733@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20110428104912.1327aa49@seibercom.net> References: <20110428104912.1327aa49@seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JQ29orswtRjjfiJM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:49:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > The "netpbm-10.35.80_2" port won't build. There is a notation that the > previous version has to be removed first. I saw something here a few > days ago regarding that problem. Is the recommended method to do a > "make deinstall && make reinstall" to get the updated port installed? I > know that portupgrade chocks on the port if a previous version is > installed. > .... As (I) documented in ports/156577, what worked for me was: pkg_delete -f netpbm-10.26.64_4 portmaster graphics/netpbm I subsequently heard from one person who reported that this did not work for him. For convenince: <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D156577>. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --JQ29orswtRjjfiJM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk25hbsACgkQmprOCmdXAD3q4QCePAxwzqRhwf3fcefHwXxvxvDv z8kAnj/ygFgvdBqyk/6DK5X1gKfFSwMj =5zWg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JQ29orswtRjjfiJM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110428152028.GS1733>