From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 25 22:37:21 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E85B1065748
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 May 2009 22:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D3F8FC1A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 May 2009 22:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4PMajEf042015;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 00:36:45 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	n4PMad0I042012; Tue, 26 May 2009 00:36:41 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 00:36:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org>
In-Reply-To: <29229B06-6098-4488-9E9A-A5CFE6F9643B@boosten.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905260035370.41921@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <200905241315.n4ODFB96007801@mp.cs.niu.edu>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905242021440.33060@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<b79ecaef0905250104p55c302cdh102202d1a06a389b@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905251013500.36458@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<b79ecaef0905250133n5cd641dv6ca8e088f8fa2f33@mail.gmail.com>
	<4A1A58FA.60303@boosten.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905251912000.40022@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<C9B964A3-BE91-4518-B13C-EE28282FD810@boosten.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905252107590.40989@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<1932D812-03CF-48AF-A306-669C39862EB7@boosten.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905252119520.41069@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<EEB4E0E6-E903-4FCD-A583-2A17ACE9E902@boosten.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0905252135050.41170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<29229B06-6098-4488-9E9A-A5CFE6F9643B@boosten.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, Scott Bennett <bennett@cs.niu.edu>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How can this 'top' command output make sense? Load over 7 and
 total CPU use ~5%
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:37:21 -0000

>
> Do you actually read back what you write: you're saying here that when a CPU 
> has only 10% utilization, it'll run slower than when performing at 100%...
>
i said it perform 10 times less work than when 100% utilized. exactly - 
read back again.

> I'm giving up ;-)
>
looks like you just want to prove that i'm wrong, nothing else. so give 
up.