From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 00:14:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B1F16A4CE; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:14:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7E643D2D; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j0O0EQD3017170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:14:27 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j0O0EQ7l030440; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:14:26 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j0O0EQV6030439; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:14:26 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:14:26 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050124001425.GD241@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050123135753.14384@mail.net-virtual.com> <20050123232738.GA78226@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050123232738.GA78226@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: NIC card problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:14:29 -0000 On Mon, 2005-Jan-24 00:27:38 +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote: >The TX threshold messages issued by the dc driver appear more as an >indication that the PCI bus is under severe load, than as a hint that >the dc driver is causing the reboots, IMHO. Under Tru64, I've seen Tulip cards report backoff to 1024 byte FIFO and then switching to store-and-forward. That's about 100µsec latency and nothing should be holding the PCI bus that long. I am inclined to believe that something is stuffed in the PCI interface logic in the NIC. -- Peter Jeremy