From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 2 14:06:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F16716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sirius.firepipe.net (sirius.firepipe.net [69.13.116.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2449043D2D for ; Sun, 2 May 2004 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by sirius.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 815B417DC2; Sun, 2 May 2004 16:06:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 16:06:35 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040502210635.GN34693@sirius.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Eikemeier , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20040501235333.GA84676@yashin.myname.mydomain> <40943C5B.4040501@fillmore-labs.com> <20040502090242.GA85884@yashin.myname.mydomain> <4094D213.9030600@fillmore-labs.com> <40951F5C.1050709@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="grb+5QKeMfpTKipq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40951F5C.1050709@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New category `lingo'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 21:06:36 -0000 --grb+5QKeMfpTKipq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:18:36PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > One thing that you can do though is to create a new category `lingo' which > will host all ports that refer to an port of another language, and then > leave out this category togehter with all other language ports. The might > help category misc too, which has too many ports anyway. >=20 > Since this seems to be an often requested feature, I can compile a list > of ports the move if there is enough interest. I don't think this is a good idea... we're always going to have some exceptions. We should simply require people to sync the whole tree... it's not that big of a deal to do this. regards, --=20 wca --grb+5QKeMfpTKipq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAlWLaF47idPgWcsURAuOFAJ9NkGWaxj3rCzwl1pjzE1z2uHNqCACfcPgE WG6TVos+w7qzaweKHtydaXk= =2z9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --grb+5QKeMfpTKipq--