From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 22:28:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94FB16A403; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp) Received: from mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp (mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp [202.238.82.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570A943D6B; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p62a1f6.tkyoac00.ap.so-net.ne.jp [219.98.161.246]) by mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp with ESMTP id k8RMSETg022825; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:28:34 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <451AFAFD.6050700@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:28:13 +0900 From: SANETO Takanori User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <200609130838.k8D8cnW9063228@repoman.freebsd.org> <4519DD53.8010005@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> <86wt7ppx16.fsf@dwp.des.no> <86odt1pww0.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86odt1pww0.fsf@dwp.des.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d mountcritlocal mountlate src/sbin/mount mount.8 mount.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:28:44 -0000 DES, I think it affects argv for external mount commands as well as nmount. In fact, on RELENG_6, I got a message like "mount_smbfs: unknown option -o late" when I put "late" in my fstab like this: //SANEWO@SMBHOST/SMBDRIVE /smb/mnt1 smbfs rw,late 0 0 Thanks, Saneto Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes: >> SANETO Takanori writes: >>> As for mount.c, following part should be MFC'ed as well. >> Thanks, I don't understand how it was left out. > > Uh, wait, it was left out for a reason: there is no equivalent code in > RELENG_6. The hunk in question removes "late" from the list of > options passed to nmount(), which isn't used in RELENG_6. > > DES