From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 05:25:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF961065671 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 05:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519EC8FC15 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 05:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDSK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m245PljX025346; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:25:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Natham" , "Mel" Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:26:47 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3b93bd110803011003p7e5e34e9k9400400e2bfe7641@mail.gmail.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:25:48 -0800 (PST) Cc: Lyle Miller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Performance Issues on 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:25:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Natham > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:04 AM > To: Mel > Cc: Lyle Miller; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Performance Issues on 6.3 >=20 > I made the test today and i got awesome results. One of my harddrives > (RAID 1 ) goes offline. I made the test with only 1 disk trasfering a > 1.7GB file trought FTP and samba. Samba got about 24mb/s and ftp got > about 45mb/s from the single disk both. Samba takes the twice the time > than ftp, it is my bottleneck anyone has any patch/suggestion to = improve > the samba performance on freebsd? >=20 Are you happy with your 45mb/s? Wern't you claiming gigabit here? Seems if it was gigabit then 45mb/s is a problem, eh? One more test for you. Map a drive on your 'doze system Drop to command line (start->run->cmd) xcopy a sample file from c: to the mapped drive xcopy a sample file from mapped drive back to c: Time it Compare the times, what are the results? What are the results in comparison with the other tests? Ted