From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 20:14:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738B010656A9; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f206.google.com (mail-gx0-f206.google.com [209.85.217.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA25A8FC1F; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: by gxk2 with SMTP id 2so20158gxk.12 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:14:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: juli@clockworksquid.com Received: by 10.90.96.1 with SMTP id t1mr2667438agb.43.1244232893194; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:14:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46FB00ED-62DC-4924-A84A-8C34B26DA22E@mac.com> References: <20090605051203.GD1705@garage.freebsd.pl> <46FB00ED-62DC-4924-A84A-8C34B26DA22E@mac.com> From: Juli Mallett Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:14:33 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4b49b52c460cf63c Message-ID: To: Marcel Moolenaar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is anything being done to un-break partition names? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jmallett@freebsd.org List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:14:55 -0000 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Jun 4, 2009, at 10:12 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: >>> >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> If I install 7.2 (or old 8-CURRENT) and partition a drive "dangerously >>> dedicated" and answer No when asked if I want to create a true >>> partition entry, and then install as normal, my system is set up with >>> partitions named like da0s1a. > > That's your problem. In a DD setup, you don't have slices. I'm not arguing about whether the names are technically correct =97 I'm concerned about POLA violations and the undocumented breakage of legitimately-installed systems. Could you please at least document this in UPDATING? It's a pretty major change and I wouldn't be so cavalier as to dismiss it as the problem of the users in question. DD configurations have worked historically and have been upgradable. I presume that the owner of libdisk/sysinstall will fix sysinstall's expectations of DD disks or remove support for them (and remove support for upgrading them or installing to disks which have already been partitioned and labeled which are DD.) Juli.