Date: 18 Apr 2002 17:39:07 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_unix and missing function warnings Message-ID: <xzp3cxtqan8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200204181500.IAA12591@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200204181500.IAA12591@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> writes: > Part of the commit log for rev 1.32 of pam_unix.c says: > > - remove dummy functions since OpenPAM handles missing service > functions > > However, OpenPAM is noisy about handling missing service functions: > > Apr 17 11:21:31 stash login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_unix.so: no pam_sm_open_session() > Apr 17 21:18:33 stash login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_unix.so: no pam_sm_close_session() > > so perhaps the stubs should go back, or OpenPAM should learn to be less > noisy about the missing functions? Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix as a "session" module while pam_unix doesn't provide session management services. PAM is correct in whining about that. The solution is to remove lines like this from /etc/pam.d/*: session required pam_unix.so DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3cxtqan8.fsf>