From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 14 07:56:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3C916A4D0
	for <ipfw@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72C443D49
	for <ipfw@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@icir.org)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3EEuigd096428;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i3EEui9U096427;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:44 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To: Ludo Koren <lk@tempest.sk>
Message-ID: <20040414075644.A95599@xorpc.icir.org>
References: <004e01c4221d$12e96c60$6466a8c0@wolf>
	<200404141451.i3EEpjJH069188@lk106.tempest.sk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <200404141451.i3EEpjJH069188@lk106.tempest.sk>;
	from lk@tempest.sk on Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:51:45PM +0200
cc: ipfw@freebsd.org
cc: tscrum@aaawebsolution.com
Subject: Re: limiting bandwith
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:56:46 -0000

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Ludo Koren wrote:
> 
> 
>      > I do not believe there is a way to "postpone" traffic with
>      > dummynet other than what is available with queues, not to
>      > mention I don't think you'd ever want to, really.  The config
>      > below will give mail a lower priority to all of the other
>      > traffic, both in and out.
> 
>      > Nat interactive addresses? Hmmm... you mean you want ipfw to
>      > forward local addresses using nat? you want to dole out local
>      > ip addresses, dhcp? Not really sure of the question here, but
>      > I'm sure its answered by following the link below to the
>      > freebsd handbook.
> 
> 
> I wrote `interactive' (ticks), and I meant addresses that are used to
> connect to ssh, web, etc (interactive processes). All these addresses
> are NAT-ed. For these, your setup is working fine. Thank you very
> much. 
> 
> The problem, I still have, is the following: the SMTP is flowing
> through, I am not relaying e-mail on this host. It seems to me, I
> cannot put together a rule which pass the traffic and add it to the
> queue except when I use keep-state flag. In this setup (keep-state),
> Luigi wrote it does not work.

i said your configuration does not work the way you want.
It is possible to write a proper configuration that does what
you want but it is left as an exercise to the reader.

	cheers
	luigi