From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 18:49:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B6C16A4BF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8EB43FAF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:49:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7K1naFL072365; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:49:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:49:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030819.194903.10922727.imp@bsdimp.com> To: grog@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030819.092307.61268786.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030819195848.GA32622@madman.celabo.org> <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: paul@freebsd-services.com cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: gordon@FreeBSD.org cc: nectar@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/devd Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 01:49:42 -0000 In message: <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: : On Tuesday, 19 August 2003 at 14:58:48 -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: : > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:23:07AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : >> There were two issues with making devd static: 1) it is a lot smaller : >> than haging libstd++ (which isn't the case for all the other : >> libraries) and 2) there were issues with crunchgen and c++ programs. : >> Making it static just cleans things up a bit. : > : > but wait, i'm about to commit new, rewritten ls(1), echo(1), rm(1) : > and a few others. they are all in C++ (C is obsolete). probably it now : > makes sense to move libstdc++.so.4 to /lib? : : Once this transition is complete, we should ask ourselves why we still : need /usr/bin, /usr/lib and /usr/sbin. Or even /usr Warner