From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 09:50:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB6216A406 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 09:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5743D6D for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 09:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k429oLCi045876 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 09:50:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k429oL7o045875; Tue, 2 May 2006 09:50:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:50:21 GMT Message-Id: <200605020950.k429oL7o045875@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Vasil Dimov Cc: Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vasil Dimov List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 09:50:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vasil Dimov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, clsung@freebsd.org, erwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:47:02 +0300 "Make sure there is no dependency on the port in the ports colloection" This is too superficial, I would suggest something like: Make sure there is no dependency on the port in the ports collection: * The only line in a recent INDEX file, containing port's PKGNAME should be port's own line. * No other ports should contain any references to port's directory or PKGNAME in their Makefiles (feel free to correct the englicsh, I hope you get the meaning) -- Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra