From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 20:33:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:33:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE5E43D48 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:33:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j13KXYes005969; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:33:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.245] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)j13KXW28021019; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:33:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20050129202425.GA56998@heechee.tobez.org> <20050129220905.46ab86ae.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <41FBFDD9.7070605@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <48b93f67db4dbc3bcb49c2e1f7e302aa@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:33:32 -0500 To: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] perl symlinks in /usr/bin will be gone X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:33:35 -0000 On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via: >> #! /usr/bin/env perl > > Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which > have /bin/env? Name one such system. [1] Hint: the path to env isn't going to change on a standards-compliant system for the same reason that /bin/sh is always found in the same place. See IEEE Std 1003.x-2001 ("POSIX"). -- -Chuck [1]: You might actually find a few very old, very broken versions of Linux which don't have a /bin/sh, only a /bin/bash. I've heard such creatures may have a /bin/env rather than a /usr/bin/env, too.