From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 26 14:45:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83E815A53 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:45:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA15863; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:44:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca5-176.ix.netcom.com(209.109.234.176) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma015806; Thu Aug 26 16:44:07 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id OAA26694; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:44:03 -0700 (PDT) To: fp_rover@lglobus.ru Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rar and linux_rar port conflict References: <19990825170011.B14625@area51.fremont.ca.us> <19990826235635.A37261@fly.lglobus.ru> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 26 Aug 1999 14:44:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Oleg V. Volkov"'s message of "Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:56:35 +0400" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "Oleg V. Volkov" * But why? linux_rar is no different from rar (except it's newer and distributed * as linux binary). Well, that makes it different. If the maintainer is willing to go through the effort of reducing ports conflicts, I don't see why not. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message