From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 19:55:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E0B106564A; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085398FC19; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4OJtv3F083445; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:57 GMT (envelope-from jhb@svn.freebsd.org) Received: (from jhb@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4OJtvli083443; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:57 GMT (envelope-from jhb@svn.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <201105241955.p4OJtvli083443@svn.freebsd.org> From: John Baldwin Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:57 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-SVN-Group: head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: svn commit: r222266 - head/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:55:58 -0000 Author: jhb Date: Tue May 24 19:55:57 2011 New Revision: 222266 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222266 Log: Silly spelling typos. Submitted by: "b. f." Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_smp.c Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_smp.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/kern/subr_smp.c Tue May 24 18:25:40 2011 (r222265) +++ head/sys/kern/subr_smp.c Tue May 24 19:55:57 2011 (r222266) @@ -348,11 +348,11 @@ smp_rendezvous_action(void) * cannot use a regular critical section however as having * critical_exit() preempt from this routine would also be * problematic (the preemption must not occur before the IPI - * has been acknowleged via an EOI). Instead, we + * has been acknowledged via an EOI). Instead, we * intentionally ignore td_owepreempt when leaving the - * critical setion. This should be harmless because we do not - * permit rendezvous action routines to schedule threads, and - * thus td_owepreempt should never transition from 0 to 1 + * critical section. This should be harmless because we do + * not permit rendezvous action routines to schedule threads, + * and thus td_owepreempt should never transition from 0 to 1 * during this routine. */ td = curthread;