Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:41:42 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: INDEX build failure FBSD 4.10 Message-ID: <200406102141.42340.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <20040611034817.GA6347@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040610221645.2be7ce46@localhost> <20040610223525.49da37b8@localhost> <20040611034817.GA6347@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 10 June 2004 08:48 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:35:25PM -0400, epilogue@allstream.net wrote: > > hello kris, > > > > d'uh and sorry. thanks for the *extremely prompt* reply and for > > being gentle. :) > > > > a couple of really quick questions... doesn't this requirement > > somewhat defeat the flexibility suggested by a 'refuse' file? > > Sort of. It's still useful, just not for what you want to do with > it. > > > did i miss an > > announcement of this feature being retired? > > It's never been supported. > However, you can refuse ports/INDEX and save yourself a 5MB download everytime you cvsup ports-all. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406102141.42340.kstewart>