From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Tue Nov 17 23:50:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF6DA31D7C for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8044F1FC8 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (unknown [87.213.41.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15DD03F42C; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:49:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:49:55 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "William A. Mahaffey III" cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [toolchain] GCC 4.8.5 compiler bug In-Reply-To: <564B4759.5050001@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <564B4759.5050001@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:50:05 -0000 Hi William, On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I have found & apparently isolated what looks like a compiler bug in > (pkg-installed, box-stock) gcc48 under FreeBSD 9.3R, see attached. I > also prepped a tarball w/ the files that produced the problem for me. > Do I post that here or to GNU ? TIA & have a good one .... GCC 4.8 is a little old, and most likely won't attract attention by upstream developers. Does this reproduce with newer version such as GCC 5? If so, that would make a report with higher chances of getting addressed. If not, can you use such a newer version? Gerald