Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:17:27 -0700
From:      Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
To:        Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: compiler:c++11-lang doesn't ensure c++11?
Message-ID:  <ec4f2b87-0155-bb88-c6c9-e61bb5a3a9e5@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170318215907.6364e561@bsd64.grem.de>
References:  <cd02dae4-ed76-effa-923d-8222d2c68764@rawbw.com> <20170318215907.6364e561@bsd64.grem.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/18/2017 13:59, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Afaik this is intentional and the point is to depend on a compiler that
> can support those features (hence the comments in compiler.mk: "The port
> needs a compiler understanding Cxx..."), but setting CXXFLAGS
> accordingly is up to the project (through cmake/configure etc.) or the
> port.


compiler:c++11-lang is supposed to add the flag when the compiler 
doesn't support c++11 by default. It is also supposed to upgrade the 
compiler (use the higher version from ports) when the base compiler. Am 
I misunderstanding the purpose of compiler:c++11-lang?


Yuri




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ec4f2b87-0155-bb88-c6c9-e61bb5a3a9e5>