From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Nov 14 09:57:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA18289 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:57:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA18279 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:57:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) id MAA00434; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:56:56 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199711141756.MAA00434@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: is NCI's "NC Server Suite" FreeBSD-based? In-Reply-To: <199711141552.HAA29091@foo.primenet.com> from "Bryan K. Ogawa" at "Nov 14, 97 07:52:36 am" To: bkogawa@primenet.com (Bryan K. Ogawa) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 12:56:56 -0500 (EST) Cc: owensc@enc.edu, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bryan K. Ogawa said: > > Well, one of Free/Net/OpenBSD, at least, and not BSDi, and with the > reference to FreeBSD, it'd have to be the leading candidate. > It IS NetBSD and FreeBSD based. The choice was due to various peoples experience (Yahoo, et.al.), licensing (non-GPL for runtime), and portability (for ARM -- NetBSD being very portable.) I was pleasantly overwhelmed to see the reputation that *BSD has in the NCI/Oracle community. -- John dyson@freebsd.org jdyson@nc.com