From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 19:18:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A648116A433 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:18:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC5843D54 for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 19:18:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AAEA60.dip.t-dialin.net [84.170.234.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208B92FEF1; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:18:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.mkbuelow.net [IPv6:::1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4OJKHE3011371; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:20:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Message-ID: <42937E71.6070604@incubus.de> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 21:20:17 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050509) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Robbins References: <429374DB.90407@pobox.sk> <200505241207.35873.fcash@ocis.net> <20050524191424.GA52486@uws1.starlofashions.com> In-Reply-To: <20050524191424.GA52486@uws1.starlofashions.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6FF22C9F; url=http://www.mkbuelow.net/mkbkeys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:18:29 -0000 Scott Robbins wrote: > Judging from the forums and various other things, it seems that a lot of > people aren't aware of the second NOTES file. (Of course, you can do > make LINT while in /conf, which I blush to admit, is what I did > before I realized the existance of the second NOTES file. :) Hmm, I didn't know about it either, even though it is referenced at the top of the machdep NOTES file (but who reads that stuff.. ;) mkb.