From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 10:44:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: i386@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7980116A402; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCDC13C465; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6AF2088; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:11:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B70D2086; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D34C3A1073; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:11:53 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Scott Long References: <20070323212254.54F7D73039@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20070323214145.GA3822@krapfengeist> <46044D6C.1070304@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:11:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <46044D6C.1070304@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:58:04 -0600") Message-ID: <86648lsmmu.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: current@freebsd.org, Matteo Riondato , FreeBSD Tinderbox , i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:44:02 -0000 Scott Long writes: > The tinderboxes have stricter compile flags than the normal buildworld > environment. The hope is that we'll be able to go to -O2 as the default > optimization someday, which requires the stricter flags. I think what > you're missing here is the -fstrict-aliasing flag. No, the tinderbox just uses -O2 (which implies -fno-strict-aliasing). I highly recommend compiling with -O2, not just for the performance advantages, and not just for the additional warnings it enables, but also because of the additional coverage analysis (required for better optimization) which results in more accurate warnings. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no