From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 15 17:53:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA89875 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A419766B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3FHrnl3037057 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:53:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199136] [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to tap(4) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:53:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: yuri@rawbw.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:53:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199136 --- Comment #4 from yuri@rawbw.com --- > can you use some of IFF_LINK flags to implement the needed feature? You mean one of IFF_LINK[0-2]? I guess this is possible, but this would require someone setting such flag on tapN interface. The way with sysctl variable is more in line with existing "uponopen" variable (similar, but for close event). Also it introduces the new default that better corresponds to the needs of most apps (I believe). So I think sysctl variable is better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.