Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:27:58 +0100 (BST)
From:      Keith Coles <Keith.Coles@wdr.com>
To:        Peter Kok <peter@sweda.com.hk>
Cc:        freebsd <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: imap & pop3 & web base mail
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.4.05.9906291308150.22938-100000@ln4p1013pos>
In-Reply-To: <3778991A.E4E66DE1@sweda.com.hk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
All three are different ways of handling a remote mailbox, but you proably
know that already...

POP3 - simple protocol, all your mail is delieverd to a remote mailbox,
your pop client copies it to your local system (it may or may not be
deleted from the mailbox host). Advantages, simple, widely supported by
clients both text & GUI on a variety of platforms. Disadvantages, simple,
no remote mailbox management, loss of delivery info (useful when tracing
the origin of a message, e.g. spam).

IMAP - more of a remote mailbox management protocol. Allows you to delete
or move messages between mailboxes in place, i.e. on the remote server.
Because your mail stays in place you can access your mailbox from multiple
clients, potentially from different sites. Advantages, better management
of remote mailbox, controlled download of attachments, folder management.
Disadvantges, the protocols a bit clunky though this can be hidden by a
good client.

Web mail - generally a bunch of cgi scripts that give you access to a
remote mailbox, e.g. Hotmail et al. Facilities depend on what the
developer decided to write in at the time. Whilst there is no standard
protocol as such, because the interface is Web based it can be accessed
from just about anything, usual stuff + Palm Pilots, Psion, Lynx text
browser........ 

Which is best ?

Depends on what you want. 

- For maximum accessibility probably web based, particularly if its a
public server. HTTP pass through is probably the most common feature of
firewalls, again adding to accessibility.

-For functionality/accessibility IMAP. Although if you only ever intend to
use one client system you probably won't notice much difference between
POP & IMAP.

-If your mailbox is on a service providers system you may have space
limitation or extra charges imposed if your mailbox grows too large. This
will impact IMAP & Web based.

Hope this helps

Keith Coles
Email Engineering
Warburg Dillon Read


On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Peter Kok wrote:

> Hello
> 
> what is different between
> 
> imap, pop3 and web base mail
> 
> which is good and common?
> 
> thank you for your advice
> 
> best regards
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.05.9906291308150.22938-100000>