From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Oct 30 14:28:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA15878
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:28:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA15869
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:28:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA10596;
	Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199710302227.OAA10596@rah.star-gate.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>,
        The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG,
        hasty@rah.star-gate.com
Subject: Re: svgalib? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Oct 1997 13:37:54 PST."
             <4223.878247474@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:27:37 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nope you are the funny guy. The task of making XF86Setup idiot proof
clearly falls into the category of not interesting to hackers.    
So far there are two possible courses:
1. byte the bullet with respect to the existing status quo
2. fund a project to address the issue

However there is the real possibility that the XFree86 project can indeed
tackle the issue.

	Amancio