Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:32:21 -0200
From:      "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        "Ricardo A. Reis" <ricardo@dis.epm.br>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Jails QOS.
Message-ID:  <43CF78C5.90108@yahoo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org>
References:  <43CE30D3.8010706@dis.epm.br> <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian,
> it seems from reading it that openVZ is closer to:
> Marco Zec's "Vimage" project ( http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/ )
> than to plain jails.
   Thanks by the attention  on my question,


    After read this url i think  "it is that" :-), but this project is 
for old 4.x and  not is maintained by official FreBSD Project,
i don't like the use patch for many reason and one example is a patch 
for multiple ip address in jail 
(http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/jail_2005020101.patch).
    The virtualization is for me the unique path, reading the 
presentation in eurobsdcon 2002, i have a question ..

   When a many numbers of the vimage caused performance degradation ? I 
have a plan to introduce a many jails for VPS (Virtual Private Server)  
in University , but i have large DB with this is possible scale one or 
more vimage ?

   
> I would like to be able to work out how to make vimage "extensible" 
> and suitable for
> inclusion in a production system because it is very cool.
>
    Introduce this project in default system is very like , i like the 
work on this but i don't  have more time for another's projects.


Thanks

Ricardo A. Reis
UNIFESP
Unix and Network Admin



 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43CF78C5.90108>