From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 11:32:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38CE16A41F for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br) Received: from maritaca.epm.br (disrouter.epm.br [200.17.25.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348FC43D49 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ricardo_bsd@yahoo.com.br) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by maritaca.epm.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13AE3A50; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:32:36 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from [172.22.1.166] (ricardo.epm.br [172.22.1.166]) by maritaca.epm.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259CB3949; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:32:28 -0200 (BRDT) Message-ID: <43CF78C5.90108@yahoo.com.br> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:32:21 -0200 From: "Ricardo A. Reis" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <43CE30D3.8010706@dis.epm.br> <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit UNIFESP-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dis.epm.br Cc: "Ricardo A. Reis" , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails QOS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:32:40 -0000 Julian, > it seems from reading it that openVZ is closer to: > Marco Zec's "Vimage" project ( http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/ ) > than to plain jails. Thanks by the attention on my question, After read this url i think "it is that" :-), but this project is for old 4.x and not is maintained by official FreBSD Project, i don't like the use patch for many reason and one example is a patch for multiple ip address in jail (http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/jail_2005020101.patch). The virtualization is for me the unique path, reading the presentation in eurobsdcon 2002, i have a question .. When a many numbers of the vimage caused performance degradation ? I have a plan to introduce a many jails for VPS (Virtual Private Server) in University , but i have large DB with this is possible scale one or more vimage ? > I would like to be able to work out how to make vimage "extensible" > and suitable for > inclusion in a production system because it is very cool. > Introduce this project in default system is very like , i like the work on this but i don't have more time for another's projects. Thanks Ricardo A. Reis UNIFESP Unix and Network Admin