From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Apr  4 11:45:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA29429
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 11:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA29418;
          Fri, 4 Apr 1997 11:45:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22])
          by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id LAA04263; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 11:36:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <33455773.3F54BC7E@whistle.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 11:33:07 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Organization: Whistle Communications
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
CC: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, phk@critter.dk.tfs.com, ache@nagual.ru,
        dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ufs lock panic in -current
References: <19304.860045426@time.cdrom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > Julian has my namei/nameifree and "EXCLUDE" NDINIT() op redundant
> > code reduction changes.
> >
> > Feel free to commit them.
> 
> How can I?  You've sent them only to Julian, and as far as I can see
> so far, he ain't talking.  This entire thread *started* from my asking
> you to put these same changes up for FTP someplace (since you
> mentioned them specifically as an example of a contribution and phk
> followed up that he wanted in) and now you're suddenly playing The
> Reasonable Man over them, after engaging in another multi-mail thread
> about how you *weren't* going to do this.


Yes I have them

basically they make sense

I'd like to discuss them with john and/or david, but the LITE2 stuff
hit so I've been sitting on them

it's probably time to bring them out again

there are some definite improvements there, but also a few things
that are more "judgement calls" and need to be thought about..

I haven't forgotten them
I'm just busy here at whistle so I
don't want to waste my time on doing them and then
finding that lite 2 makes it all  useless.