Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:50:24 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Joseph Gleason <clash@tasam.com>
Cc:        Ian Campbell <ianc@ednet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Greater than 2GB per process
Message-ID:  <20010311205023.P18351@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <003701c0aaaf$a4566ce0$dc02010a@fireduck.com>; from clash@tasam.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 11:48:09PM -0500
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.31L2.0103120005460.9179-100000@pachabel.ednet.co.uk> <20010311204130.N18351@fw.wintelcom.net> <003701c0aaaf$a4566ce0$dc02010a@fireduck.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Joseph Gleason <clash@tasam.com> [010311 20:48] wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@wintelcom.net>
> To: "Ian Campbell" <ianc@ednet.co.uk>
> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 23:41
> Subject: Re: Greater than 2GB per process
> 
> 
> > * Ian Campbell <ianc@ednet.co.uk> [010311 16:14] wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Could anybody advise me on the possiblity of having greater than
> > > 2GB per process on FreeBSD. I have tried increasing the limit beyond
> this
> > > and the kernel compiles successfully - however libc causes every process
> > > to segfault. I am assuming that just recompiling the C library wouldn't
> do
> > > the trick but perhaps someone could confirm this.
> >
> > It's not possible on the Intel archetecture with the current system,
> > changing the current intel system to use > 2GB processes would cost too
> > much in terms of performance (64 bit values on a 32 bit system).
> >
> > At least that's what i've been told.
> >
> 
> I know very little about how kernel or low level processor stuff works, but
> shouldn't we be able to do a 4GB process on a 32-bit system?
> The limitation of 2GB per process should only be an issue if there is some
> need to use signed numbers, right?

Yes, we use signed numbers.  Check the list archives, there's some
pretty detailed discussions that explain why it's this way.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010311205023.P18351>