Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:16:41 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/2379 Message-ID: <199706060216.TAA29379@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970605163606.1739A-100000@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> (message from Pedro Giffuni on Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:42:33 -0400 (EDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Yes, NetPBM is a dependency, and there is also support for many other * graphic devices (including NCSA telnet and TIFF) that work, but had to be * activated in the configuration file. Sorry, my question was whether it is a compile-time dependency (which it surely is, I had to adjust the libp?m paths in some patches) only or is a runtime dependency also (i.e., does it call any of the programs?). The original port had it as LIB_DEPENDS, but since the netpbm port doesn't build shared libraries, it was impossible to tell which. * I remember this is a very useful port, but the original porter made some * desesperate scripts I didn't like. I'll take a look later and see what can * be done. I'm sure it is useful. When I looked at the PR, I thought "gosh, why hasn't URT been in our collection!". ;) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706060216.TAA29379>