From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 25 19:51:44 2006
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 4B45C16A40A; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D648D16A405;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jb@what-creek.com)
Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CABD43D72;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jb@what-creek.com)
Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102)
	id 8670678C1D; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:40 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:40 +0000
From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060425195140.GB69623@what-creek.com>
References: <200604242332.k3ONWeRq008991@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200604251106.50641.jhb@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200604251106.50641.jhb@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 96028 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:51:44 -0000

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:06:49AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> This is odd, why did you do this?  Note that the cast shouldn't be needed
> for one, and that curthread is already basically defined to be this (though
> tweaked to optimize the kernel build for some archs like i386 and amd64).

I thought I was getting a compiler error. I just tried again without that
and it worked. I'll remove it.

--
John Birrell