From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 24 22:26:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0C616A4CE for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1EA43D2D for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:26:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4P5OlbI029415; Mon, 24 May 2004 22:24:48 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:25:15 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040525044508.GA13463@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040525044508.GA13463@tao.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405242225.15812.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: which kinds of AMD work withh FBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 05:26:09 -0000 On Monday 24 May 2004 09:45 pm, Gary Kline wrote: > Fellow BSD'ers, > > What kinds of the newer AMD processors worth with FreeBSD? > It might be better long-run to buy a barebones system than > mess with upgrading 5-yr-old boxen. I'm thinking of something > in the >= 2GHz rangewith 512MB and a 60 or 80G drive. So far > I've stuck with Intel since my first 8085/8088. No problems > with Unix. If AMD is a good enough clone, it may be time to > give it a shot. > I don't know if it is still true but for quite a while I thought they were the only Intel class cpu that understood Seymour's principle. It doesn't matter how many cpus you have if you don't have the data paths and bandwidth to load and store data. A little X/MP was faster than a Cray 2 because of memory contention. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html