From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan  8 02:43:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA00104
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 02:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA29996
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 02:43:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.3/8.6.9) id CAA13701; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 02:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 02:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199601081043.CAA13701@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: phk@critter.tfs.com
CC: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <3313.820938475@critter.tfs.com> (message from Poul-Henning Kamp on Sat, 06 Jan 1996 15:27:55 +0100)
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I think that's fine.  By the way, don't forget to let the ports and
packages be fetched from ports-current and packages-current on the ftp
site, without the "-current" users will get 2.1 versions.

I don't have time to rebuild all the packages right now (although many
of them are already built over the last couple of weeks).

Satoshi