From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 07:36:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09F116A4D1 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pear.silverwraith.com (66-214-182-79.la-cbi.charterpipeline.net [66.214.182.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2618743D2F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avleen@pear.silverwraith.com) Received: from avleen by pear.silverwraith.com with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AecCg-000EKr-DS for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:36:10 -0800 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:36:10 -0800 From: Avleen Vig To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040108153610.GW53429@silverwraith.com> References: <20040107235737.I32227@pooker.samsco.home> <20040108143934.GA51446@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040108143934.GA51446@ussenterprise.ufp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: Avleen Vig Subject: Re: Discussion on the future of floppies in 5.x and 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:36:16 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:39:34AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote: > It would require a whole new floppy booter setup, but I can see > other OS projects using something like this as well, so perhaps > some cross work with NetBSD or OpenBSD, or even the Linux camp could > make an open source "load an image" floppy, that since it just > loaded an ISO could load about anything. If I understand you right.. A floppy boot, which loads the absolutely basic stuff (network drivers, and some easy way to config the network) and then goes and grabs the installer would otherwise be on the current floppies and "boots" it? This sounds like a good solution - they we wouldn't have to worry about: If people have cd burners or not The size of the installer (for most practical purposes as long as the installer itself doesn't hit 600Mb :P) Compatibility with CD drives