From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Jun 19 21:50:29 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE82315180
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 21:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au)
Received: (from avalon@localhost)
	by cheops.anu.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA05782;
	Sun, 20 Jun 1999 14:50:27 +1000 (EST)
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199906200450.OAA05782@cheops.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: proposed secure-level 4 patch
To: brian@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (Brian W. Buchanan)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 14:50:26 +1000 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906182330210.70357-100000@smarter.than.nu> from "Brian W. Buchanan" at Jun 18, 99 11:35:52 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In some mail from Brian W. Buchanan, sie said:
[...]
> I'd totally agree with you on the -2 issue, but adding securelevel 4 which
> the system can be raised to after root-owned processes have bound all the
> privileged ports they need could be a useful thing to have.

Man, that's nasty.  Reboot to restart something.

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message