Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:32:18 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Cc:        Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: TCP&IP cksum offload on FreeBSD 4.2 
Message-ID:  <69917.1001658738@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:40:54 EDT." <200109280340.f8S3esZ71606@whizzo.transsys.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200109280340.f8S3esZ71606@whizzo.transsys.com>, "Louis A. Mamakos" 
writes:

>The paper that someone mentioned earlier in this thread had some
>statistics on various classes of errors.  In a nutshell, they put
>packet sniffers on 4 different networks, and collected traffic.  For
>each back packet (where the checksum and ethernet CRC differed), they
>then looked for retransmissions of the same data, and tried to characterize
>the different failure modes they observed. 
>
>It's very interesting reading.

Absolutely.  We have a pretty big FreeBSD concentration at one of
my customers and I was actually considering running their collector
(if I can get my hands on it) just to see what the error rate is...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?69917.1001658738>